Tag Archives: book-review

U.S. Battle over Alfred Hitchcock’s Cultural Legacy

In the new book A Century of Hitchcock: The Man, the Myths, the Legacy, critics and journalists have started debating a much larger question: How should we judge historical figures when memories evolve, evidence conflicts and biographies become accepted truth?

This week, veteran film critic Mick LaSalle devoted a major feature in the San Francisco Chronicle to the book’s central argument. Instead of asking whether readers should like Alfred Hitchcock, LaSalle asks whether some of the assumptions surrounding Hitchcock’s reputation deserve to be re-examined in light of archival evidence and newly available testimony. He describes the book as “well-researched” and highlights the 1980 UCLA transcript of Donald Spoto with Tippi Hedren as one of the most significant pieces of evidence in the debate.

Importantly, LaSalle does not present the discussion as one of heroes and villains. Nor does he suggest that every question has been answered. Instead, he asks readers to consider how historical narratives are formed, how memories can change over decades, and how biographies themselves can influence public understanding. That mirrors the response the book has received internationally in newspapers such as The Australian and the Netherlands based Volkrants.

Some reviewers have welcomed the reassessment of Donald Spoto’s work and the wider examination of memory, testimony and historical reconstruction. Others have argued that the book devotes too much attention to challenging established narratives or remain persuaded by Tippi Hedren’s later account. That difference of opinion is entirely legitimate. History advances through debate, not unanimity.

Perhaps the most encouraging aspect of the response so far is that the discussion has largely centred on evidence, sources and interpretation, rather than simple repetition of long-established stories. Whether readers ultimately agree or disagree with the book’s conclusions, they are engaging with the archival record and asking important questions about how cultural history is written.

Save Hitchcock was established in 2012 to encourage precisely this kind of evidence-based discussion. It was never intended to canonise Alfred Hitchcock or dismiss criticism, but to ensure that competing accounts, contemporary documents and first-hand testimony were given proper consideration alongside later recollections. The conversation is clearly not over. Nor should it be.

You can read Mick La Salle’s review here:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/entertainment/books/article/alfred-hitchcock-tippi-hedren-book-22313627.php

Leave a comment

A Century of Hitchcock Sparks International Debate About the Director’s Legacy

Just one week after publication, a new book A Century of Hitchcock: The Man, the Myths, the Legacy is generating intense debate in newspapers, film magazines and websites around the world, reigniting the controversy about Alfred Hitchcock’s reputation, the Tippi Hedren allegations, Donald Spoto’s biographies and how the #MeToo movement has influenced the way audiences view the legendary director.

Published by the University Press of Kentucky to coincide with the centenary of Hitchcock’s first film, The Pleasure Garden (1925), the book examines Hitchcock’s life and films as well as the battle over his legacy and the writing of his memoirs after his death in 1980.

Perhaps the most striking response has come from reviewers who have focused on Part Three of the book, Hitchcock’s Legacy, which explores how Hitchcock’s public image was shaped by biographers, journalists and changing cultural attitudes. Reviewing the book in The Film Stage, the critic highlighted the section dealing with Donald Spoto’s controversial biography The Dark Side of Genius, noting: “Of particular note is the story of Donald Spoto’s salacious, still-controversial biography, The Dark Side of Genius.”

Meanwhile, Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant examined the way stories about Hitchcock have evolved over time, asking whether the director was really the “sadistic tyrant” often portrayed in popular culture. Reviewer Floortje Smit concluded that one of the book’s most interesting arguments is that personal memories, cultural change and competing narratives can make an objective historical reconstruction difficult.

In Australia, The Australian explored a question that has become increasingly common in recent years: Would Alfred Hitchcock survive the #MeToo era? The article examined how contemporary audiences interpret allegations made against Hitchcock and whether historical figures should be judged solely through a modern lens.

The discussion reflects one of the central themes of A Century of Hitchcock: that the story of Alfred Hitchcock did not end with his death. Instead, a second battle emerged over who would control the narrative of his life and career. Competing biographers John Russell Taylor and Donald Spoto gave very different accounts of the director’s life. Taylor was the offifical biographer but Spoto may have been spurred by personal grievances – Hitchcock’s dog bit him and the director reportedly disliked him.

For decades, Donald Spoto’s bestselling biographies helped define Hitchcock’s public image. Later, HBO’s The Girlintroduced that interpretation to a new generation of viewers. Yet many of Hitchcock’s collaborators, friends and family members disputed those accounts, leading to an ongoing debate that continues today.

As Entertainment Focus observed in its review: “The third and final part of the book – Hitchcock’s Legacy – is perhaps the most compelling part of Moral’s book.”

Whether readers may agree or disagree with the book’s conclusions, the international response suggests that Hitchcock remains one of cinema’s most fascinating and contested figures. One hundred years after the release of his first film, the debate over Alfred Hitchcock’s life, work and reputation shows no sign of ending. Drop you thoughts in the comments below.

A Century of Hitchcock: The Man, the Myths, the Legacy is published by the University Press of Kentucky.

Leave a comment